More justification for my theories – Americas populated from the coast first!
Posted On: Sep 22nd, 2016 at 09:16
Americas
Here we go again. I have to repeat myself a lot, mainly for those who perhaps don’t actually read my posts, that I am of the opinion the Americas were populated many thousands of years before the typical model of the peopling of the Americas, and that the south was populated long before the north.
Once again new evidence comes to light, this time destroying once and for all the migration theory across the Bering Land Bridge. This theory has been the accepted theory for many decades but I have never believed a word of it – that the Americas were first entered from Siberia, across the Bering Land Bridge during the ice age, and then all of these populations slowly moved south and populated the Americas.
This theory has never held much water as far as I am concerned, and just the idea of people slowly moving south and populating the entire continent from the north is just absurd in the extreme, and even a five-year-old can see that (no offence). It’s more than obvious – in fact it is ludicrous to think otherwise – that different parts of the Americas were populated at different places and at different times. The migration of humans into the Americas was clearly along the coasts of both north and south America, and from east and west, from all over the world.
Even the 2 to 3,000-year-old Paracas skulls – those weird elongated skulls – have recently been proven to have European and Middle-Eastern DNA, repeatedly tested and beyond doubt.
I am excited that the ridiculous theory of the Americas is now being fully destroyed, with new evidence almost arriving on a weekly basis.
It does make you wonder what other “accepted” theories are wrong, doesn’t it. I am certain there are many. One of those is the birthplace of civilisation…
