Butchered mastodon takes American history back further
Posted On: May 16th, 2016 at 02:26
United States
I would like to reiterate a point I’ve been making on this page periodically and for many years.
I am of the opinion, after more than twenty years of research, that the Americas were populated AT LEAST 20,000 years ago, and that South America is most likely to have been inhabited before North America. This is not an opinion I make lightly – it is more than obvious to me that human activity in the Americas has evolved for many thousands of years, and the native Americans who still inhabit the continent appear to have unique characteristics that suggest they have evolved independently for much longer than twenty thousand years. Although DNA evidence shows clearly that many native American populations have their origins in Mongol and Manchurian populations, many others appear to have lineages that cannot be traced to anyone. The distinctive features of the Americans are so much different from their supposed ancestry that one must question not only the DNA evidence, but the supposed theory that the Clovis People were the first Americans. In fact, the ‘Clovis First’ theory has already been dismissed as far as I am concerned, as many findings have concluded categorically that another population was there long before they arrived, wherever they supposedly came from. I am surprised there are still those that believe the Clovis were the first.
Another important factor is the new findings surrounding the Younger Dryas Impact, which clearly show fragments of a comet smashed into the north American ice sheet approximately 12,800 years ago (10800 BC) and caused such devastation that the north American continent raged with intense fires, many large mammalian species were made extinct, and impact spherules have been found as far as the Middle East. Clearly this was not a small impact, but a series of massive impacts that not only hit simultaneously, but together practically wiped out all of the large animals that existed at that time… including human beings.
Interestingly the comet that caused the Younger Dryas – the period of climate change that occurred for more than a thousand years from the time of the impact – is also known as the Clovis comet because it has been attributed to wiping out the Clovis population.
The points I am trying to make are simple – there is no doubt that human beings existed in the Americas prior to the impacts, but nearly all traces of them were wiped out at the time of the devastation. There were likely then populations that survived in the southern half of the continent. Already evidence has been found in Brazil that suggest people existed there more than 20,000 years ago, and these findings have been put forward with good evidence – an axe was found in stratum dating to the correct time period mentioned. So how do the so-called scholars deal with that data? They dismiss it as false, and suggest the axe somehow “fell into” the stratigraphic layers. This is what is known as “knowledge filtration” whereby those with a hold over current theory disregard hard evidence and hide it away. This is a very common feature of archaeology and something I mentioned briefly in my book.
The second point is that prior to the Younger Dryas impact north America was a huge ice sheet, several miles thick, but the southern half of the Americas was very warm in comparison. For that reason it is most likely the south was inhabited before the north. I think the first Americans were likely from the Polynesian islands, and a later migration occurred from Manchuria. I base this evidence on the fact that Australia was inhabited at least 80,000 years ago but the East Asian lands were inhabited many tens of thousands of years later. Quite simply the people inhabiting the southern half of the planet had a major head start… and neither did they have a several-mile thick ice sheet to deal with.
In this article yet another piece of evidence comes to light – a butchered mastodon bone and stone tools have been found in south-eastern United States – at least a thousand years earlier than human beings were supposedly first there, and dating to 14,550 years ago (12550 BC).
This finding clearly shows that even at that time the people were adept hunters and tool makers, and must have been there for quite some time. What I mean is if North America was populated from the Bering Land Bridge then these people, or populations, managed to get all the way to the south-eastern United States… I can assure you they didn’t go by bus.
This finding clearly shows that even at that time the people were adept hunters and tool makers, and must have been there for quite some time. What I mean is if North America was populated from the Bering Land Bridge then these people, or populations, managed to get all the way to the south-eastern United States… I can assure you they didn’t go by bus.
So if these artefacts date to 14,550 years ago, you can bet your bottom dollar that people were in the Americas way before that time… The dates keep being pushed back, and sooner or later my “theory” will be proven correct.
