New evidence places humans in Peru 15,000 years ago
Posted On: May 26th, 2017 at 00:30
Peru
Here we go again!
More evidence is coming to light that forces archaeologists and scientists to re-think the model of human habitation in the Americas. I’ve said my piece on this many times, I don’t need to repeat myself!
In northern Peru artefacts have been found dating to 15,000 years ago, during the ice age, and before the Younger Dryas period. The relevance of the Younger Dryas will be apparent in one of my next posts. Whether these people shuffled “down the coastline from north America”, arrived from Polynesia, arrived from elsewhere or even evolved on the continent is not likely to be known, but at the very least it’s another log on the burning pile of rubble that was once the accepted model of how humans migrated to the Americas.
Here’s some hilarity for everyone:
“Dillehay did not find any fishing lines, nets, or harpoons. But he suspects people didn’t need them because storm surges would have sent seawater flooding deep inland, leaving behind pools full of stranded marine creatures.”
What a load of crap!
The truth is he didn’t find those artefacts and neither did they need them because they were not coastal inhabitants i.e. they didn’t arrive by straddling the coastline from North America! You can see what they are constantly trying to do – find evidence that only fits the theory which they believe to be true. These people were not adapted to a life on the sea coast in the way the theory suggests, which tells us very clearly that the theory is wrong.
Another telling clue is this quote from the article:
“As old as this is, you’re probably not looking at the first peoples on the landscape.”
Really, I would never have thought that! They contradict themselves without even realising it!
Well, I did say that I have already said my piece on this but there’s more. I don’t like how the scientists are trying to manipulate only slightly their current theory by simply stretching the edges a bit to make it fit the original. As you can see they are saying humans still came across the Bering land bridge and then slowly edged down the coast. Already the date of human beings in the Americas has been put back 10,000 years with recent findings, completely destroying the accepted theory, so to use the same theory but only adjust the dates is bad science. I can’t prove it but I know it’s wrong. There is no doubt South America was populated before the north. Before I am dead that evidence will come to light, and I won’t go to my grave until it does! There is another theory. In fact there are many. Soon this ridiculous idea will be blown apart. Watch this space…
