**Breaking News** Durrington Walls made of wood, not stone

Posted On: Aug 13th, 2016 at 10:14

England
Ironically I visited the Durrington Walls and Woodhenge sites yesterday, while taking a friend on her first tour of the area, including Avebury and Silbury Hill.
Also Ironically this report was released yesterday.
Astonishingly the Durrington Walls site was actually made of huge wooden posts and not stones as archaeologists had previously thought. This brings in a whole different concept to what was going on in the area. I do not believe the “guess” that Durrington Walls was built to house the builders of Stonehenge as there is simply no evidence for that and there never will be.
Previously it was thought that Woodhenge was a wooden counterpart to the larger Stonehenge, but I think it more likely that Durrington Walls was the wooden counterpart, simply because of its size in comparison to Woodhenge.
Either way the archaeologists need to scrap their previous guesses and make more guesses, as they are doing… No doubt there will be more guesses and no evidence to come. It’s rather tiresome to be honest.
After more than twenty years of research I have absolutely no idea what Stonehenge was built for, nor Avebury, nor Silbury Hill, nor Durrington Walls and nor Woodhenge. Anyone who says they do is just lying, and guessing is only adding to the confusion when reports like this come out in the media, because next week there will be another theory. There must be more theories out there now than the years since these sites were built.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3736185/Stonehenge-II-WOOD-Vast-4-500-year-old-timber-circle-built-commemorate-builders-famous-neighbour.html